Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFFon your first order!
originalresearchpapers.com logo
Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFF on your first order!
originalresearchpapers.com logo

640 Module 2 ReflectionState standards provide a common framework for educators to align their instructional goals, while

640 Module 2 Reflection

State standards provide a common framework for educators to align their instructional goals, while High-Leverage Practices (HLPs) emphasize collaboration as a critical component for effective special education
Links to an external site.
Links to an external site.. By working together to unpack and interpret state standards, teachers can leverage their collective expertise to design aligned assessments, create effective lessons, and implement instructional strategies that meet the diverse needs of all students, including those with disabilities.

First,

· Watch the video about how to “unpack the standard:  
unpacking the standardLinks to an external site.

· Access and read the
 High Leverage Practices section on collaboration,Links to an external site.

· Post your completed State Standards/Clear Targets assignment. 

 

Then, address the the following:

1. Define the key vocabulary identified within your selected standard and the HLP (LT1).

2. Using the 
What, Why and How of the standardLinks to an external site., identify three areas collaborative activities which can be extrapolated from the standard and represented in the 3-part learning objective. (LT2))

3. Given a special needs situation (academic/social-emotional) determine which HLP/collaboration might be appropriate to apply. (LT3)

4. Explain why creating a measurable learning target aligns with intent of Danielson Domain 1 and why this is this important in assessment? (LT2)

Respond to a minimum of three of your classmates. You may use the 
verbs from 
Blooms TaxonomyLinks to an external site. provided. 

Textbooks & Course Materials

This text is mandatory and can be purchased or rented through the textbook links in Canvas.
● Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. (2020). Classroom assessment for student learning: Doing it
right – doing it well (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. ISBN-9780134899114

Optional-to-purchase texts used throughout the course. Chapters will be provided in the modules.
● Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.).
Pearson. ISBN 978-0134027296
● Cohen, L. G and Spenciner, L. J. (2015) – Assessment of children and youth with special
needs (4th ed.). Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. ISBN: 978-0133574753
● Salvia, J., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Witmer, S. (2017). Assessment in special and inclusive
education (13th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning. ISBN: 978-1305887329

Reflective Rubric

Reflective Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Entry Quality

8 pts

Advanced

1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 3 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 300-500 words long.

6 pts

Proficient

1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 2 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 250-300 words long.

5.25 pts

Novice

1. Candidate responds to the guiding questions/discussion prompts by synthesizing information from course readings; 2. Candidate cites at least 1 specific points from the reading(s). 3. Candidate responses are 150-250 words long.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConnections

8 pts

Advanced

Candidate makes substantive connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner.

6 pts

Proficient

Candidate makes some connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner.

5.25 pts

Novice

Candidate makes little or no connections to self as teacher/candidate/learner.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style and Composition

8 pts

Advanced

Assignment contains 2 or fewer errors.

6 pts

Proficient

Assignment contains 3 – 5 errors.

5.25 pts

Novice

Assignment contains 6 or more errors.

8 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTimeliness

4 pts

Advanced

Journals are submit on time each Module.

2 pts

Novice

4 pts

Total Points: 28

image1.png

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORTStudent’s Name:

FIELD EXPERIENCE REPORT Student’s Name: Date of Completion: TITLE OF THE ACTIVITY KNOWLEDGE (Check one) NELP/PSEL STANDARDS ADDRESSED New _____ Changed _______ Reinforced __________ NELP: PSEL: Summary (provide a clear and concise description of the information you collected and additional details as needed) Reflection (share your thoughts about the experience

You deserve a bonus!

Subscribe and get regular bonuses and discounts.