Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFFon your first order!
originalresearchpapers.com logo
Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFF on your first order!

Our Services

Get 15% Discount on your First Order

Aberystwyth University Town Hall Presentation to Your Community Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

DISCUSSION 1—In Unit 6, you had the opportunity to give a town hall presentation to your community. As the director of the local public health department, stakeholders such as academicians, health professionals, state health department staff, representatives from affected communities, and representatives from nongovernmental organizations are looking to you to understand all aspects of the strategic planning process, as well as the results of the community needs assessment.

Using terms that anyone (academician or lay person with no statistical background) could understand, concisely answer the following questions:

  1. How can you determine (prove) that the public health intervention or approach (applied to a specific community need/problem) you presented will have an effect?
  2. What is the purpose of having effective size?
  3. What is the definition of significance (significance testing)?
  4. As you make decisions about the sustainability of the intervention presented, would effect size or significance be most important in your decision-making process? Why?

DISCUSSION 2—Return to the public health pyramid in Chapter 1 of your textbook, and identify a service level. Then identify and describe an appropriate qualitative method for two stages in the planning cycle (for example, assessment, planning, monitoring, outcome evaluation). Be sure to define the qualitative method and comprehensively explain why you chose it in alignment with the service level identified

DISCUSSION 3—Review the approaches that you have taken as director of the local public health department to facilitate stakeholder (community) involvement, beginning in Unit 1. Discuss how you have involved stakeholders in the planning, development, implementation, and/or evaluation plan. In what ways did your approaches include or not include enough attention to group processes? At what key points in the planning and evaluation cycle did you make (or should have made) recommendations to improve stakeholder involvement overall?

DISCUSSION 4–Find elements of your project where inequality or bias may be an issue. How will the issues of bias and inequalities in your study be addressed?

Expert Solution Preview

Introduction:
In this response, we will address each of the four discussions raised in the content provided. These discussions revolve around various aspects of public health interventions and approaches, stakeholder involvement, and addressing bias and inequalities in a study. We will provide concise answers to each question, ensuring clarity and accessibility to both academic and layperson audiences.

Discussion 1:
1. To determine the effectiveness of a public health intervention or approach, various methods can be utilized. One common approach is conducting pre- and post-intervention assessments. By comparing data collected before and after the implementation of the intervention, changes in the targeted community need/problem can be observed. Additionally, statistical analyses, such as regression analysis or comparison of means, can help quantify the impact of the intervention on the desired outcome.

2. The effective size represents the magnitude or strength of the observed effect. It is a measure of the practical significance of the intervention. A larger effective size indicates a more substantial impact on the community need/problem. It allows stakeholders to understand the real-world implications of the intervention, regardless of statistical significance.

3. Significance, in the context of significance testing, refers to the statistical determination of whether the observed effects are likely to have occurred by chance. It helps establish the validity of the intervention’s impact. Significance testing involves comparing the observed data to a null hypothesis and calculating the probability of obtaining the observed results purely by chance. P-values are commonly used to assess significance, with a lower value indicating stronger evidence against the null hypothesis.

4. When making decisions about the sustainability of the intervention, both effect size and significance should be considered, but their relative importance may vary. Effect size provides valuable information about the practical impact of the intervention, helping stakeholders understand the real-world implications. On the other hand, significance testing helps determine the validity of the intervention’s impact, reducing the likelihood of spurious findings. Consequently, both measures are crucial for comprehensive decision-making, with the balance between them depending on the specific context.

Discussion 2:
Considering the public health pyramid, let’s choose the service level of “assessment.” For this stage, a suitable qualitative method is focus group discussions. Focus groups involve a moderator-led discussion with a small group of individuals from the community. These discussions help gather in-depth insights and perceptions regarding the assessed health issue. By engaging participants in an interactive and open environment, focus groups provide valuable qualitative data, exploring attitudes, beliefs, and experiences within the community. This method aligns with the assessment stage as it allows for a comprehensive understanding of the community’s perspective, facilitating the development of targeted intervention strategies.

Regarding the planning stage, a relevant qualitative method is key informant interviews. Key informants are individuals with specialized knowledge or prominent roles related to the health issue under consideration. Through individual interviews with these key informants, a deeper understanding of planning factors, available resources, and potential barriers can be gained. This method helps inform the development of effective intervention strategies by identifying key considerations from knowledgeable stakeholders.

Discussion 3:
To facilitate stakeholder involvement, various approaches have been applied throughout the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. Stakeholders have been included through regular meetings, workshops, and working groups. Their input has been actively sought during the assessment phase, with data collection methods including surveys and interviews targeting community members. During the development and implementation stages, stakeholders have provided valuable insights and feedback through collaborative decision-making processes. In the evaluation phase, stakeholders have been involved in reviewing findings, providing recommendations, and participating in dissemination activities.

However, attention to group processes should be improved to ensure enhanced stakeholder involvement. Key areas that require attention include fostering an inclusive and participatory environment, addressing power dynamics, providing clear communication channels, and acknowledging the diverse perspectives and needs of stakeholders. In addition, utilizing facilitation techniques, such as consensus-building exercises or structured discussions, could enhance collaboration among stakeholders and streamline decision-making processes.

Discussion 4:
In any project, there is a potential for inequality or bias to be present. To address these issues, several steps can be taken. Firstly, during the study design phase, ensuring diverse representation in the sample can help mitigate bias and inequalities. It is crucial to include individuals from various socio-demographic backgrounds to avoid underrepresentation or overrepresentation of certain groups.

Secondly, while collecting data, employing standardized protocols and rigorous quality assurance measures can minimize potential biases. This includes training data collectors to adhere to ethical principles, ensuring data collection tools are unbiased and culturally appropriate, and implementing rigorous data validation procedures.

Furthermore, during data analysis, conducting subgroup analyses based on relevant demographic or socioeconomic variables can help identify potential inequalities. This allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the impact of the intervention on different population groups.

Lastly, in the interpretation and reporting of findings, it is essential to discuss any observed biases or inequalities transparently. Acknowledging and addressing these issues in both the academic and public health communities can promote awareness, stimulate further research, and contribute to more equitable interventions.

By implementing these strategies, researchers and public health professionals can contribute to reducing bias and inequalities in their studies, ultimately striving for more inclusive and impactful interventions.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Understanding how the health care system works and evolves Nursing Assignment Help

Understanding how the health care system works and evolves provides health care administrators and leadership with awareness of the position of their organization and facilitates compliance with health regulations. Discuss in detail each component of the U.S. delivery system, its function, and how it supports the delivery of care. Describe

This assignment requires you to conduct the Strengths (S), Nursing Assignment Help

This assignment requires you to conduct the Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (T) SWOT Analysis.  As the planner for your health organization (selected by you), you will need to prepare a 3-page document addressing your organization’s internal and external environment to include, but not limited to, forces/trends,

Health from A Public Health Nursing Perspective Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

Read chapter 1, 2 & 6 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentations once done answer the following questions. 1. Compare and contrast definitions of health from a public health nursing perspective. 2. Explain the difference between public/community health nursing practice and community-based nursing practice. 3. Discuss

Compare and Contrast Definition of Health from Public Nursing Assignment Help

Read chapter 1, 2 & 6 of the class textbook and review the attached PowerPoint presentations once done answer the following questions. 1. Compare and contrast definitions of health from a public health nursing perspective. 2. Explain the difference between public/community health nursing practice and community-based nursing practice. 3. Discuss

MSN Maternal and Child Health Essay Nursing Assignment Help

Health Policy Briefs provide succinct overviews of health policy  topics. The intended audience is policymakers, journalists, and others  concerned about improving health care in the United States. The briefs  explore arguments made on various sides of a policy proposal. They  provide guidance on available research behind each perspective. Health  policy

End of Life Ethical Decisions Discussion Nursing Assignment Help

I’m trying to study for my Health & Medical course and I need some help to understand this question. 2. Ethical issues arising from end-of-life decisions are among the most common that health services organizations and their clinical and managerial staff encounter.  Technology is central to the ethical and legal

HIM2588 Data Steward Presentation Nursing Assignment Help

Imagine that you are a Data Steward and your employer has asked you  to teach others in the organization about your role and  responsibilities. Prepare a PowerPoint slideshow that describes the role  and various responsibilities of a Data Steward. Your presentation should be a minimum of 8 slides (including a

After presenting your capstone Power Point on CAUTI write a Nursing Assignment Help

After presenting your capstone Power Point on CAUTI write a 250-350 word summary of the presentation. Include a description of the feedback and questions from your audience after your presentation, and how this interprofessional collaboration and experience will affect your professional practice in the future solid academic writing is expected,

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/59876 Nursing Assignment Help

https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/59876 https://www.cdc.gov/training/publichealth101/public-health.html https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/59876 The Public Health System [WLO: 1] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3, 4]  This week’s discussion is on the role of the public health system within the greater view of the U.S. health care system. Prior to beginning work on this discussion forum, please review the United States Public Health

Identify the APN you interviewed and summarize the Nursing Assignment Help

Identify the APN you interviewed and summarize the interview, which may include (if not in the interview, please address): Describe the organization and setting, population, and colleagues where your interviewee works. Examine regulatory and legal requirements for the state in which you plan to practice/work (and that your interviewee resides,

You deserve a bonus!

Subscribe and get regular bonuses and discounts.