Business Brief Presentation 1 based on Chapter 14 (Gender and Leadership)
business briefings on leadership topics drawn from Northouse’s Interactive Book on Leadership. This presentation is based on either one of the week’s assigned reading chapters. has one slide per person outlining your take on the theory of leadership (with the additional cover slide and reference slides. The slides should: 1) summarize the theory. 2) explain how it adds to leadership studies 3) discuss criticisms of the theory, 4) present some new material on the theory (last five years {the more recent the better}), and 5) provide your group’s assessment of the approach with respect to today’s workforce and current global environment (e.g. is it useful, practical, easy, dated).
The briefing will be assessed using the Rubric criteria on each dimension:
Accuracy – did you make an accurate summary of the theory and its critics
Presentation Quality – were the slides professional (font, size, color choices etc)
Value – did the new material extend the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way
Credibility – was the group’s assessment credible
Text book
Northouse, P.G. (2022) Leadership: Theory and Practice (9th edition), Sage Leadership
Theory and Practice (You must have the 9th edition for this class, older editions will not
work)
By: Peter G. Northouse
Publisher: SAGE Publications, Inc
Print ISBN: 9781544397566, 1544397569
e-text ISBN: 9781071834473, 1071834479
Rubric
Business Briefing 22
Business Briefing 22 |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy Summary of theory and critics |
19 pts
Superior 90-100 pts. Thoroughly accurate summary of the theory and its critics. [19 to 17.1 points] |
17 pts
Excellent 80-89 pts. Mostly accurate summary of the theory and its critics. [15.2 to 17 points] |
15.1 pts
Good 70-79 pts. Somewhat accurate summary of the theory and its critics. [13.2 to 15.1 points] |
13.1 pts
Fair 60-69 pts Not very accurate summary of the theory and/or its critics. [11.4 to 13.1 points] |
11.3 pts
Poor 0-59 pts. Missing the summary of the theory and/or its critics. [0 to 11.3 points] |
| 19 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTeam Professional presentation by group members |
19 pts
Superior 90-100 pts. All of the group members presented for at least one minute in a professional manner and no individual presented for more than two minutes. [19 to 17.1 points] |
17 pts
Excellent 80-89 pts. Not all of the group members presented for at least one minute in a professional manner, and no individuals presented for more than two minutes. [15.2 to 17 points] |
15.1 pts
Good 70-79 pts. All of the group members presented for at least one minute in a somewhat professional manner and no individual presented for more than two minutes. [13.2 to 15.1 points] |
13.1 pts
Fair 60-69 pts Not all of the group members presented for at least one minute in a professional manner, and one or more individuals presented for more than two minutes. [11.4 to 13.1 points] |
11.3 pts
Poor 0-59 pts. Not all of the group members presented for at least one minute and the presentation was not done in a professional manner. [0 to 11.3 points] |
| 19 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation Quality Professional looking slide deck |
19 pts
Superior 90-100 pts. The slides were very professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc). [19 to 17.1 points] |
17 pts
Excellent 80-89 pts. The slides were professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc). [15.2 to 17 points] |
15.1 pts
Good 70-79 pts. The slides were somewhat professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc), but they could have been more engaging to the audience. [13.2 to 15.1 points] |
13.1 pts
Fair 60-69 pts The slides were not professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc), and/or they could have been more engaging to the audience. [11.4 to 13.1 points] |
11.3 pts
Poor 0-59 pts. The slides were not professional in terms of (font, size, color choices etc) and they were not engaging to the audience. [0 to 11.3 points] |
| 19 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValue Extending the conversation beyond the textbook |
19 pts
Superior 90-100 pts. The new material (research) extended the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way. [19 to 17.1 points] |
17 pts
Excellent 80-89 pts. The new material (research) somewhat extended the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way. [15.2 to 17 points] |
15.1 pts
Good 70-79 pts. The new material (research) barely extended the textbook material in a relevant and interesting way. [13.2 to 15.1 points] |
13.1 pts
Fair 60-69 pts The new material (research) barely extended the textbook material and it was not relevant and/or interesting. [11.4 to 13.1 points] |
11.3 pts
Poor 0-59 pts. The new material (research) did not extended the textbook material. [0 to 11.3 points] |
| 19 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCredibility Reliability of the group’s assessment |
19 pts
Superior 90-100 pts. The group’s assessment was highly credible. [19 to 17.1 points] |
17 pts
Excellent 80-89 pts. The group’s assessment was somewhat credible. [15.2 to 17 points] |
15.1 pts
Good 70-79 pts. The group’s assessment was basically credible. [13.2 to 15.1 points] |
13.1 pts
Fair 60-69 pts The group’s assessment was not very credible. [11.4 to 13.1 points] |
11.3 pts
Poor 0-59 pts. The group’s assessment was not credible. [0 to 11.3 points] |
| 19 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Adhere to APA guidelines for citations and references
5% |
5 pts
Superior 90-100 pts. Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 0 errors. [4.5 to 5 points] |
4.4 pts
Excellent 80-89 pts. Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 1 error. [4 to 4.4 points] |
3.9 pts
Good 70-79 pts. Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 2 errors. [3.5 to 3.9 points] |
3.4 pts
Fair 60-69 pts Properly formatted APA style citations and references with 3 errors. [3 to 3.4 points] |
2.9 pts
Poor 0-59 pts. Properly formatted APA style citations and references with more than 3 errors. [0 to 2.9 points] |
| 5 pts |
