CJ 120 Project Three Guidelines and Rubric
Competency
In this project, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following competency:
- Describe how differences in culture impact society’s interactions with criminal justice professionals
Scenario
You are in the same role you chose for Project One: Because you did such fantastic work with the training you held for community members and sworn officers, the Civilian Office of Accountability, a local advisory board, has invited you back to report back with specific potential ideas for the location you chose for Project One. The board would like to hear your thoughts on relevant issues, such as how other cultures view criminal justice professionals, and typical types of misunderstandings between such professionals and civilians.
Directions
Suggestions Report
For your report, feel free to take information from any of the module resources, or use outside resources.
- Describe different cultures’ or subcultures’ views of criminal justice professionals.
- Include at least three of the following (different from your own background) that are relevant to your community:
- Native Americans
- Asian communities
- Hispanic communities
- Refugees
- People of color
- Undocumented people
- Explain the general views that are culturally based.
- Describe the reasoning (often historical) behind those views.
- Include at least three of the following (different from your own background) that are relevant to your community:
- Describe incidents of cultural misunderstanding between criminal justice professionals and civilians. Address the following in your assessment:
- Language
- Religion / beliefs
- Illiteracy
- Deafness
- Describe professional practices that may create cultural sensitivity in criminal justice professionals. Address the following in your assessment:
- Understanding the public
- Diversity training
- Procedural justice
- Police legitimacy
- Diverse hiring practices
- Assess best practices to build trust within cultural communities. Address the following in your assessment:
- Creating an understanding of the community
- Transparency
- Accountability
- Positive community interactions
- Visibility
What to Submit
To complete this project, you must submit the following:
Suggestions Email with Attachment
Your suggestions for the board in your hometown area will be sent in a formal business email with an attachment. The email should be introductory—describing you and your task, and including a brief summary of the attachment—and the attachment should include the formal information they’ve requested.
Supporting Materials
The following resource(s) may help support your work on the project:
Reading:
Guide for Writing an Email and Creating an Email Invitation PDF
This resource explains how to write a professional email.
Project Three Rubric
| Criteria | Exemplary (100%) | Proficient (85%) | Needs Improvement (55%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Articulation of Response | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling | Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling | 18 |
| Different Views of Criminal Justice Professionals | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Describes different cultures’ or subcultures’ views of criminal justice professionals | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include misinterpreting groups’ views of criminal justice professionals | Does not attempt criterion | 18 |
| Incidents of Cultural Misunderstandings | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Describes incidents of cultural misunderstanding between criminal justice professionals and civilians | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include misinterpreting misunderstandings between criminal justice professionals and civilians | Does not attempt criterion | 18 |
| Professional Practices for Cultural Sensitivity | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Describes professional practices that may create cultural sensitivity in criminal justice professionals | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include describing practices that may not be useful to creating cultural sensitivity for the identified groups | Does not attempt criterion | 18 |
| Best Practices for Building Trust | Exceeds proficiency in an exceptionally clear, insightful, sophisticated, or creative manner | Assesses best practices to build trust within cultural communities | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include choosing practices that are not best practices | Does not attempt criterion | 18 |
| Citations and Attributions | Attributes sources where applicable using citation methods with very few minor errors | Uses citation for ideas requiring attribution | Attributes sources where applicable, but with major errors | Does not attribute sources where applicable | 10 |
| Total: | 100% |
