Need help? We are here

In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following:
Provide an overview of the article you selected. I download the article I selected
What population is under consideration?
What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?
What were the author’s claims?
Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. Support your position with evidence-based literature.
Note: The presentation should be 5–10 slides, not including the title and reference slides. Include presenter notes (no more than ½ page per slide) and use tables and/or diagrams where appropriate. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from the article you selected. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Expectation for this assignment is that you respond to all the sections concisely as stated in the first paragraph of this post on your slides while using the appropriate citation. If you choose to add notes, make sure that they are succinct and to the point.
Rubric:
Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.–
Excellent 27 (27
%) – 30 (30
%)Good 24 (24
%) – 26 (26
%)Fair 21 (21
%) – 23 (23
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 20 (20
%)
Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.–
Excellent 5 (5
%) – 5 (5
%)Good 4 (4
%) – 4 (4
%)Fair 3.5 (3.5
%) – 3.5 (3.5
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 3 (3
%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to:
Understand and interpret the assignments key concepts.–
Excellent 9 (9
%) – 10 (10
%)Good 8 (8
%) – 8 (8
%)Fair 7 (7
%) – 7 (7
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 6 (6
%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to:
Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.–
Excellent 18 (18
%) – 20 (20
%)Good 16 (16
%) – 17 (17
%)Fair 14 (14
%) – 15 (15
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 13 (13
%)
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extent to which the work reflects the students ability to:
Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.–
Excellent 18 (18
%) – 20 (20
%)Good 16 (16
%) – 17 (17
%)Fair 14 (14
%) – 15 (15
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 13 (13
%)
Written Expression and Formatting
Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–
Excellent 5 (5
%) – 5 (5
%)Good 4 (4
%) – 4 (4
%)Fair 3.5 (3.5
%) – 3.5 (3.5
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 3 (3
%)
Written Expression and Formatting
English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Excellent 5 (5
%) – 5 (5
%)Good 4 (4
%) – 4 (4
%)Fair 3.5 (3.5
%) – 3.5 (3.5
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 3 (3
%)
Written Expression and Formatting
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing,
margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Excellent 5 (5
%) – 5 (5
%)Good 4 (4
%) – 4 (4
%)Fair 3.5 (3.5
%) – 3.5 (3.5
%)Poor 0 (0
%) – 3 (3
%)