Module 4: Individual Project – Social Determinants of Health by County of Residence
My County Miami
________________________________________
Prepare a document based on the demographics of your county of residence to indicate the specific social determinants of health for that geographic area. You can find the social determinants of health for your county by accessing the following link: to an external site.
• After completing the first part of this project, you will need to do the following:
• Describe how your county compares to the state (or to the neighboring county) and which area you believe is most important for the APRN to address in your county.
Instructions:
• Submit your assignment before 11:59 p.m. ET on Sunday.
• Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded.
• Your assignment will be checked through Turnitin to verify if there is any plagiarism. Check your results, make the necessary corrections, and resubmit a revised copy if the system identifies issues.
Criteria Grades Pts
This criterion depends on a learning competencyProfessionalism
Application of concepts
20 for >18.0 pts
Excellent
The student meets 90% to 100% of the content required by the task, showing facts, theories, definitions, and other aspects applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Based on the information presented, the written assignment meets the requested information.
18 for >16.0 pts
Good
The student meets 80% to 89% of the content required by the assignment, showing facts, theories, definitions, and other applicable elements to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Based on the information presented, the written assignment meets the requested information.
16 for >14.0 pts
Average
The student meets 70% to 79% of the content required by the task, showing facts, theories, definitions, and other applicable elements to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Based on the information presented, the written assignment meets the requested information.
14 for >12.0 pts
Poor
The student presents information that contains between 60% to 69% of the expected content required by the task, showing facts, theories, definitions, and others applicable to the situation, recognizing all basic and complex factors. Based on the information presented, the written assignment meets the requested information.
12 for >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment does not reflect the requested results, is off-topic, or was not submitted.
20 pts
This criterion depends on a learning competency in Communication.
Written communication
20 for >18.0 pts
Excellent
The writing is completely free of grammatical, punctuation, or formatting errors.
18 for >16.0 pts
Good
The writing is mostly free of grammatical, punctuation, or formatting errors. The few errors it has do not interfere with the ideas expressed.
16 for >14.0 pts
Average
The writing contains several grammatical, punctuation, or formatting errors, but they do not interfere with the expressed ideas.
14 for >12.0 pts
Poor
The writing contains several grammatical, punctuation, or formatting errors. The errors interfere with the expressed ideas.
12 for >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment does not reflect the requested results, is off-topic, or was not submitted.
20 pts
This criterion depends on a communication learning competency.
Format
20 for >18.0 pts
Excellent
The written document meets 90% to 100% of the required format elements, as described in the assignment requirements. The information presented is complete in all these elements.
18 for >16.0 pts
Good
The written document meets 80% to 89% of the required format elements, as described in the assignment requirements. The information presented is complete in all these elements.
16 for >14.0 pts
Average
The written document meets 70% to 79% of the required format elements, as described in the task requirements. The information presented may lose some details, but without distorting the required format.
14 for >12.0 pts
Poor
The written document meets 69% or less of the required format elements, as described in the task requirements. The information presented may lose some details and distort the required format.
12 for >0 pts
Unacceptable
The assignment does not reflect the requested results, is off-topic, or was not submitted.
20 pts
This criterion depends on a learning competency: Critical thinking and logical reasoning
Process of thought analysis
20 for >18.0 pts
Excellent
All basic and complex details are considered. The situation, problem, or diagnosis is identified with precision and is adequately expressed in the document. The process of analysis and thinking presented in the written assignment is impeccable and clear.
18 for >16.0 pts
Good
Most of the basic and complex details are considered. The problem, situation, or diagnosis is accurately identified and correctly expressed in the document. The process of analysis and thinking presented in the written assignments is impeccable and clear.
16 for >14.0 pts
Average
Most of the basic and complex details are considered. The problem situation or diagnosis is identified. It is possible that some of the parameters were not entered correctly in the document. The process of analysis and thinking as presented in the written assignments is clear.
14 for >12.0 pts
Poor
Only the basic details are considered. The problem, situation, or diagnosis is identified. It is possible that some of the parameters were not entered correctly in the document. The process of analysis and thinking, as presented in the document, are not clear conclus
