NUR4153CBE Section 01CBE Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment (11 Weeks) – CBE Online Course – 2024 Summer Quarter
Deliverable 5 – Outcomes-based Cycle of Clinical Reasoning and Clinical Judgment
Top of Form
Bottom of Form
Assignment Content
1.
Top of Form
Competency
Modify clinical judgment within an iterative, outcome-based cycle of clinical reasoning and client needs.
Student Success Criteria
View the grading rubric for this deliverable by selecting the “This item is graded with a rubric” link, which is located in the Details & Information pane.
Scenario
You were recently invited to your alma mater to participate in a clinical judgment roundtable with alums. The audience includes nursing students enrolled in their last term before graduation. You were asked to prepare a one-to-two-page handout for the round table discussion to facilitate a conversation about the outcomes-based dynamic cycle of clinical reasoning and clinical judgment.
Instructions
Create a one-to-two-page handout that includes the following information:
· Summarize a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including examples and rationales.
· Describe the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
· Choose the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
Resources
Submit a Word document with your handout.
Bottom of Form
·
A – 4 – Mastery
Comprehensive summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including superior examples and rationales.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Satisfactory summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including sufficient examples and rationales.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Somewhat reasonable summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including some examples and rationales.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Partial summary of a clinical experience you found challenging for clinical judgment, including minimal examples and rationales.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
·
Criterion 2
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Detailed description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Satisfactory description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Somewhat reasonable description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Partial description of the most appropriate client intervention supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
·
Criterion 3
0% of total grade
A – 4 – Mastery
Skillful selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including superior supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
B – 3 – Proficiency
Satisfactory selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including sufficient supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
C – 2 – Competence
Somewhat reasonable selection of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including some supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
F – 1 – No Pass
Vague of the next most appropriate client interventions supported with relevant cues, hypotheses and priority hypothesis, including minimal supporting rationales and evidence from credible sources.
0
I – 0 – Not Submitted
Not Submitted
0
·
Criterion 4
