Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFFon your first order!
originalresearchpapers.com logo
Hello there! Want a discount? Grab 5% OFF on your first order!
originalresearchpapers.com logo

See attached for instructionsAfter reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis (DVT)

See attached for instructions

After reviewing the materials you created to research a specific diagnosis

(DVT)
in the first two assessments, apply the PICO(T) process to develop a research question and research it.

Your initial goal is to define the population, intervention, comparison, and outcome. In some cases, a time frame is relevant and you should include that as well, when writing a question you can research related to your issue of interest. After you define your question, research it, and organize your initial findings, select the two sources of evidence that seem the most relevant to your question and analyze them in more depth. Specifically, interpret each source’s specific findings and best practices related to your chosen diagnosis, and explain how the evidence would help you plan and make decisions related to your question.

If you need some structure to organize your initial thoughts and research, the PICOT Question and Research Template document (accessible from the ”

Create PICO(T) Questions
” page in the Capella library’s Evidence Based Practice guide) might be helpful.

In your submission, make sure you address the following grading criteria:

· Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach. Create a PICO(T)-formatted research question

· Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question (databases, journals, websites, etc.).

· Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence as it relates to the identified health care issue.

· Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.

· Communicate using writing that is clear, logical, and professional with correct grammar and spelling using the current APA style.

Example Assessment: You may use the following to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like:
See Attachment for example

Your assessment should meet the following requirements:

·
Length of submission: Create a 3-5 page submission focused on defining a research question and interpreting evidence relevant to answering it.

·
Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your findings and considerations. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.

·
APA formatting: Format references and citations according to the current APA style.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

· Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.

· Explain the findings from articles or other sources of evidence that are relevant to the health care issue.

· Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.

· Identify sources of evidence that could be potentially effective in answering a PICO(T) question.

· Explain the relevance of the findings from chosen sources of evidence to making decision related to a PICO(T) question.

· Competency 3: Apply an evidence-based practice model to address a practice issue.

· Define a practice issue to be explored via a PICO(T) approach and develop a PICO(T)-formatted research question.

· Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.

· Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.

· Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.

DO NOT USE AI


REFERENCES LESS THAN 5 YEARS OLD

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

 Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/PracticeThe

 Presentation: Critical Review & Evaluation of Health Promotion Protocol/Practice The purpose of this assignment is to complete a review of a screening tool utilized by nurse practitioners in maintaining individual, family, or community health. Your presentation should: 1. Identify and select a screening tool   2. Research of ethical, economical and

MY ARTICLE    http://www.mdpi.com/journal/medicines  *Instructions: 1. Utilize your

MY ARTICLE    http://www.mdpi.com/journal/medicines  *Instructions: 1. Utilize your selected article that answers your PICO questions 2. In the article, identify the following components of the research process.  Highlight, underline or bracket, on the article, each component listed with the corresponding number from this worksheet.  If any component is missing, make a

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. General

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the Collaboration Café. Contact your course faculty if you have questions. General Instructions Electronic health records (EHRs) provide a database for an individual’s healthcare data during healthcare encounters and the ability to exchange health information electronically. Consider an EHR with which you

You deserve a bonus!

Subscribe and get regular bonuses and discounts.